Friday, May 29, 2009

MacDonald's Phantastic Voyage

A few nights ago, I finished George MacDonald's Phantastes. Phantastes being the plural of the Greek word from which we get fantasy. The original meaning of fantasy was "an image held in the mind." That's a big hint about where this is going.

And I have to tell you, I loved it. I wholeheartedly recommend it to fans of the Early English Romantic Poets, especially Wordsworth and Blake. (Technically, Blake was a pre-Romantic, but most non-hairsplitting types let it slide.)

It all starts with the "one-and-twentieth birtday" of the main character,Anodos. Upon his birthday, he is invested with certain items and legal rights, among them the right to use the key to his dead father's secretary. (The piece of furniture. Not the employee. This isn't the Bluths we're talking about.) Inside the secretary, he finds . . . papers. This is where things start to turn sideways.

While perusing the papers, Anodos has a conversation with a three inch tall woman who claims great age and infers her place in his ancestry. She invites him to explore Fairy Land and the next 300 pages are crammed full of his experiences there.

There is swashbuckling. There is philosophy and poetry (I did mention the Romantics, right?). There is a Grand Romance, dreams within dreams, layers of meaning, myth, folklore, allegory, transcendentalism, &c., &c.

Eventually Anodos makes his way through Fairy Land after traversing the heights and depths and width of experience available to him, gaining a shadow, fighting giants, living the tales in the books of the Fairy Palace Library. And the reader is sucked into the action of each and every tale. MacDonald is a master of fluid, magical prose.

MacDonald unapologetically tells a linear trans-logical tale. He tells forty or more stories with no apparent connection to the rest other than the inclusion of Anodos and his quest through Fairy Land.

The weakness of Phantastes is the the lack of readily graspable internal structure. The strength of Phantastes is the masterful Story-telling.

For an easier introduction to MacDonald's story-telling skills, and a wonderful book (ostensibly for kids) full of strong characters and cool symbolism, check out The Princess and the Goblin.

10 comments:

Loren Eaton said...

That lack of structure is what turns a lot of people off to MacDonald, I think. I'll admit to having troubles with Phantastes and Lilith, too. There is organization to what he's doing; however, much of it lies on a thematic level. (I'm indebted to a friend for revealing this to me.)

B. Nagel said...

I can't place my finger the exact thematic tie(s) in Phantastes, but it's something to do with redemption and grace, belief beyond sight, the power of love. Also, evil. Evil makes several appearances. The whole book felt like a bit of a ramble, but it was an engrossing ramble.

I'm going to say something here that might get me plastered as a blasphemer, but MacDonald has edged Tolkien out of my top 2 Old UK Dudes who wrote Kickin' Fiction.

Loren Eaton said...

My friend -- who loves MacDonald -- thought that the theme the interludes revolved around was selfless love.

B. Nagel said...

I see that.

Joshua Gordon said...

I've not read Phantastes, but I HAVE read Princess and the Goblin, as well as the sequel, the Princess and Curdie - which, incidentally, has absolutely the most depressing final page I've ever read.

- Josh

B. Nagel said...

Sounds like I need to stay willfully ignorant of the sequel. That is a shame.

Joshua Gordon said...

Well, the sequel's good, but... well, just read it. You'll know when you get there.

- Josh

ollwen said...

I remember reading Phantastes in summer in high school, and being struck by the unpredictability of chain of events, and the extremely vivid images the prose brought to my imagination. I also remember feeling a kind of unease throughout the reading, as though I had dipped my mind into something characteristically pagan. . . I guess the classic British Isles mythos of Faerie is. The themes and allegory are essentially Christian, though, aren't they? I have a vague recollection of a reference to Phantastes by a Christian author who loves to make references to stories to inspire and shore up his theological assertions. He was unpacking the allegory of the hollow-tree prizon, I think. . .

ollwen said...

Princess and the Goblin was fun too, but I like The Hobbit more.

B. Nagel said...

Thanks for stopping in ollwen!

Yeah, it's Christian. MacDonald was a minister back in the day.

You'll see pagan mythology and imagery in most of MacDonald, Lewis and Tolkien. I'm not sure about the others, but Lewis believed that all myths attempted to communicate the same truths, the essential Truth of Christianity.

As a prime example, see the river god in Prince Capsian, or just check out the wikipedia page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chronicles_of_Narnia#Paganism

Post a Comment

A Comment Spot